As long as master is clean, it’s fine to run git pull. I can quit my annoying habit of running git fetch and git reset -hard origin/master every time I checkout a new branch. To do this, you need to fetch first and then run git reset -hard origin/. In this case, it’s better to just reset your local branch to whatever is on origin. Sometimes a branch has diverged from origin so much, that it doesn’t make sense to try to resolve all the conflicts. This is first example of 'git checkout' I have seen that checks out files from remote repo. Maybe 'git fetch' or 'git pull' would work. If they cannot be resolves, it will result in merge conflicts. Teacher's notes here do not reflect video. Git will attempt to auto-merge any local changes. This is useful if someone else has made new commits, on your branch, and you want to merge them into your branch. Git pull does two things: git fetch and then git merge origin/. You’ll also need to use it to checkout a new branch that someone else has pushed. If your branch names are generally long, and you constantly merge the branch you just checkout from, you can use: checking out from branch you want to merge. This would be the one you use to update a local branch. git pull will update and merge any remote changes of the current branch youre on. git fetch will update only the branch youre on, but not merge any changes in. You’ll need to use this command to get the latest changes that others have made. git remote update will update all of your branches set to track remote ones, but not merge any changes in. Git fetch downloads commits, files and branches from the git remote. The answer is summarised in this StackOverflow answer. Is git fetch required? How does this differ from git pull? What’s the difference between git pull and git reset -hard origin/master? I decided to find out, in this blog post. It’s a habit and I realised that I’m not sure why I do it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |